Interfering with Police Officer’s Duties Attorney Houston Texas

If you are charged with Interfering with Police Officer’s Duties in Houston, TX, Harris County, or surrounding areas, call (832) 328-0600 or email defense attorney Carl Haggard today for a free consultation regarding your case. Carl is an Ex-Chief District Prosecutor with over 30 years of verifiable winning experience against interfering with police officer charges. After you personally speak with an attorney, The Haggard Law Firm will immediately go to work to provide you with the best defense possible.

Just a Sample of Our Winning Houston TX Case Results:

Duties Police OfficerINTERFERING WITH DUTIES OF POLICE OFFICER

Case 21796830 ‐ Martin.

DISMISSED June 12, 2018

Martin’s wife was being arrested for DWI when he, also intoxicated, aggressively grabbed her purse out of two arresting officers’ hands on two separate occasions during her arrest. We successfully argued lack of situational awareness due to his impaired state then negotiated for a Dismissal in return for community service. This turned out to be a blessing in disguise for Martin: he located a boxing gym for kids near his house to do his hours at, decided to enroll his two sons, and reported he began to bond more with them over the activity.


Interfering police offer duties houston
Live video of arresting incident.
INTERFERING WITH POLICE OFFICER DUTIES

Case No. 2095152 ‐ Michael S.

DISMISSED Sept. 16

Five people were arrested in Houston and charged with interfering with a police offer’s duties at a family graduation party after a fight broke out in front of the house. While 4 of these people were interfering and assaulting police, Michael was trying to pull them away so police could do their job. Due to the number of combatants and officers the scene was confusing. We used witness affidavits and over 6 videos of witnesses, body cams, and dash cams to carefully reconstruct the incident and argue to prosecutors that the arresting officer had his back turned during the main part of Michael’s involvement and misconstrued his actions of trying to help for interfering. We successfully got Michael’s charges dismissed.


INTERFERING WITH DUTIES OF POLICE OFFICER

Case 2066661 ‐ Christopher M.

DISMISSED May 10

Chris had been to Texas Department of Corrections for Assault on a Police Officer so we had to get this dismissed ‐ a trial would have been a big risk. Chris was at his company Christmas party at a restaurant in Houston when a fight broke out between his boss and someone else. Chris got in between them trying to break up the fight. A uniformed Harris County Sheriff deputy was on duty and appeared on the scene quickly. He stated Chris pushed him out of the way and that he then told Chris if he did that again he would be tasered. Chris allegedly body slammed the officer and then balled his fist and flexed his arm as if to throw a punch. Chris had to be tasered 2 full cycles before becoming compliant. The evidence appeared to be against us but we subpoenaed the surveillance video (which was inconclusive) and then argued the case forcefully using our several witnesses and Affidavits, resulting in the interfering with duties of police officer charge being dismissed.


INTERFERING WITH POLICE OFFICER DUTIES

Case No. 1944434 ‐ Mohamad B.

DISMISSED Sept. 8

This was a case of an innocent client ‐ a US citizen and Houston business owner, and a vindictive, racist police officer with an attitude. A customer was test driving a car from our client’s car dealership when it ran out of gas. Client immediately sent 2 employees for the car. When they arrived it was in the process of being towed but the driver refused to lower it without $145 cash. Client arrived and offered to pay with a company check but the tow driver refused. So client agreed to cash if given a receipt – but the driver refused and became agitated. Client felt he must be making an illegal tow and continued to press for a proper receipt. A Houston police officer arrived who knew nothing of the background but took the tow driver’s side and authorized him to proceed with the tow. Client asked to be allowed to pay the cash and take the car. The officer refused either from prejudice or from failing to take the time to inform himself of the background. Client said he was going to make a complaint to the officer’s captain and then asked the tow driver for the name of the storage lot his car was being towed to. The employee witnesses testified there was no physical contact. But the officer lied and arrested client, “for pushing the wrecker driver.” Then he said sarcastically and with racial slurs, “And now you can call my supervisor and complain.” His report contained several other lies. It took 2 hours after client was in jail for the DA’s office and police to decide on what to charge him with. This paperwork intensive case was prepared for Trial using tow ordinances and laws, tow and vehicle paperwork, tow company owner/experts, client’s 2 employee witnesses and – our well-argued position that client never interfered with the officer’s duties in the 1st place ‐ the TRUTH. The interferring with police officer duties charges were dismissed on the eve of Trial.


INTERFERING WITH POLICE OFFICER DUTIES

Case No. 1941932 ‐ Justin H.

DISMISSED March 27

Justin was a passenger when his fiance lost control of the car and crashed into the corner of a house.  Justin and the homeowner were both intoxicated and they got into it several times, requiring additional police units to be called to the scene and making the officer interrupt his investigation several times to stop the escalation.  Once arrested Justin further worsened his odds by spitting on the window of the police car and kicking at the door but we were still able to argue for a Dismissal on this case.


INTERFERING WITH POLICE OFFICER’S DUTIES

Case No. [Expunged by Mr. Haggard] ‐ Tammy S.

JURY TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY

Our client was accused of a type of resisting arrest. A private guard/eyewitness testified on behalf of our client and Mr. Haggard was able to convince the jury that she had not interfered.

Mr. Haggard was aggressive and never let his guard down. He fought hard for me and was great at presenting my case. He allowed me to make all my decisions and offered me options. The Jury liked his presentation.
~ Tammy S.

The Haggard Law Team

Houston Texas Criminal Defense Law Firm