
Drink Wheel Calculator
If you've been accused of, have a warrant, or are under investigation for:
- DWI

- DWI 2nd
- Felony DWI
- DWI with Accident
- DUI
call us to speak with expert
HOUSTON DWI DEFENSE ATTORNEYS
CARL D. HAGGARD
The Haggard Law Firm
WARNING – DWI’s: You have 15 days to save your TDL.
Call us to learn your ALR options and what will guarantee a Dismissal to save your TDL.
JUSTICE DOESN'T JUST HAPPEN
Carl Haggard's sterling reputation for integrity makes him one of Harris County’s most-respected criminal defense attorneys.
Clients rely on Carl Haggard’s expertise: 
Former Harris County District Court Chief Prosecutor
Nationally Certified Mediator-Arbitrator - Triple Certification
Nationally-Known Author and Speaker on Civil Rights
Washington, DC Speech-Maker on Constitutional Issues
Licensed to Practice in the United States Supreme Court
Honors Graduate from Law School - Cum Laude
Former UH Adjunct Professor of Law
Thousands of Cases and Trials Since 1973
RESULTS ARE WHAT COUNT
Houston DWI Defense Attorney Carl Haggard is at the forefront of Harris County Criminal Defense Attorneys with a proven track record of winning results for clients charged with DWI, DUI, Felony DWI and related Intoxication Offenses.
SAMPLE HARRIS COUNTY DWI VICTORIES*
Case Synopses and Testimonials included with some of these cases; clients have given written permission for use of Testimonial.
Dismissals and “Not Guilty” verdicts may be verified for accuracy using the listed case numbers through the County Clerk’s office except for those noted as expunged in civil actions filed by Mr. Haggard.
Click here for latest Court of Criminal Appeals ruling on DWI case.
DWI 2nd Arrest- BT REFUSAL/SFST FAILURE
Case No. 1659042 - Thomas T.
DISMISSED - 05.11.10
Thomas doubted whether we could pull off another Dismissal [see below]. His friend was intoxicated and had asked Tom to drive. In what sounds like one of the best "yeah yeah sure sure a likely story" stories we've heard in a long time, Tom informed us that the huge swerve he was pulled over for making was actually caused by his intoxicated passenger who grabbed the wheel. Tom failed the sobriety test. The police didn't buy it. We made sure the DA's did. Two DWI Dismissals in four months... we pulled it off but - Tom - don't do it again!
DWI - BT FAILURE
Case No. 1622875 - Thomas T.
DISMISSED - 01.21.10
This was the first of the two DWI Dismissals we won for Thomas in four months. Tom was discovered by police passed out in his vehicle with the engine running. He was obviously intoxicated and failed the breath and sobriety tests. Our defense revolved not around the issue of intoxication but whether police could wheel him - prove he had been driving beyond a reasonable doubt. Through a careful reconstruction of Thomas' timeline that evening, involving friends and several restaurant and club visits as well as a convoluted transporting of various people to various vehicles, including sworn witness testimony and cell phone records to verify who called whom and when .... we were able to knock this one out just on the eve of trial.
DWI 2nd - BT & SFST REFUSAL
Case No. 1659042 - Russell J.
DISMISSED - 05.04.10
Russell was stopped for speeding after leaving a sports bar. He refused everything – breath and field sobriety tests. The Offense Report stated he had a blank stare and was uncooperative – usual indices of intoxication. When told to cooperate or he would be arrested his only reply was, “Let’s go.” Moreover, he stated that he had just left his girlfriend’s house whereas a large part of our defense was witness testimony from several drinking witnesses at the bar he had just left. Despite the obvious lie to police and the lack of cooperation, we were able to argue this DWI 2nd charge to Dismissal with the aid of drinking witness testimony backed up by an Affidavit of Business Records from Russell’s credit card issuer verifying the amount of alcohol purchased from the bar.
DWI 2nd - BT Failure
Case No. 1642218 - Gilbert E.
DISMISSED - 02.03.10
Gilbert was stopped after a concerned citizen called police saying that he was swerving. He failed the breath test and admitted to Wild Turkey with friends at a bar. We beat this 2nd DWI for him by arguing that he passed the Rhomberg and walk and turn tests on his field sobriety video as well as using the extrapolation defense.
DWI W/ CHILD
Case No. 1202611 - Michael B.
NO BILLED BY GRAND JURY - 04.23.09
Mike was pulled over by police with guns drawn after a witness saw vehicles scattering like roaches when the light's turned on to get out of the way of an 18-wheeler that "failed to maintain a single lane of travel many times." His rights were never read but he took and passed the breath test. Police claimed he was DUI on medication. The drug recognition expert testified Mike was under the influence of a narcotic, a stimulant, and a depressant. He failed field sobriety tests and his eyes were "too erratic to conduct the HGN [eye] test". Mike admitted to taking prescription medication. The severe weaving was admitted as well but attributed to the shoddy condition of his rig, which we documented with lengthy repair records. We prepared a well-documented defense for the Grand Jury and the Chief Prosecutor which included the fact that DOT would have shut the rig down had they inspected it, other valid reasons for Mike's poor performance on the FST, which mimicked intoxication, and the inadmissibility of some of the evidence.
"My wife and I team-drive over the road with our daughter. I had
given up hope of being able to drive but now I'm looking forward to
many miles ahead. [He would have lost his CDL with a DWI
conviction.] Thanks to Mr. Haggard we're ready to roll again!"
~Michael B.
DWI
Case No. 1565317 - T. T., M.D.
DISMISSED - 03.13.09
Dr. T. was a physician charged with DWI after having some drinks over dinner with a colleague; his detailed and very credible testimony as a drinking witness helped us in the case. Dr. T. refused the breath test but did perform the field sobriety tests - although police failed to video the first of the two scene tests. Dr. T. admitted to police to having drinks with dinner, which amounts were corroborated in the testimony of the doctor witness. We argued that the evidence of intoxication - based on the reason for the stop, the videos, and the amount of alcohol consumed was not indicative of intoxication. In particular we presented a report on Dr. T's video after evaluating it with a fine-toothed comb and it all added up to a Dismissal.
DWI - BREATH TEST .12
Case No. 1524140 - Mike M.
DISMISSED - 03.11.09
We had several factors in our favor in this case and only one against us - the breath test: Several police cruisers arrived on the scene after Mike was initially stopped for tailgating a police officer. We contested this as the officer was behind Mike, not the other way around. He performed well on both of his sobriety videos but blew a .12 on the breath test - although this was approximately 2 hours after being stopped [for "tailgating"]. We had several drinking witnesses lined up to testify at trial that Mike consumed food with his alcohol and moreover was quite sober when leaving the club. We were ready to try this case when the State developed one problem in proving the validity of the failed breath test - and declined to proceed further against us.
"I blew a .12 and most lawyers advised me to plead guilty but Carl
Haggard got my case dismissed in trial. From the first time I spoke to
him after researching on whom to defend me, Mr. Haggard insisted that I
fight the case and he fought it all the way from day one." ~ Mike M.
DWI
Case No. 1560110 - Sheila G.
DISMISSED - 03.11.09
Being stopped for going the wrong way on a one-way street + at night + admitting to drinking, at a Christmas party + failing the HGN [eye] test = a DWI arrest. The only positive thing Sharon had going for her case was she refused the breath test. Our defenses included contesting the reason for the stop as not indicative of intoxication: Our scene photos showed the intersection was under construction; we further argued it was confusing and that intoxication played no role in the wrong turn.
DWI WHILE ON PROBATION FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT
Case No. 1582060 - Enrique G.
DISMISSED
Enrique was on probation for Sexual Assault when charged with DWI. His judge had told him, "If I see you in my court for any law violations while on probation, you're going up." Enrique was actually the passenger in this unusual case. His cousin, whom he resembled, was the driver in this hit-and-run accident. Both were wearing white sweaters. Ironically, it was Enrique who convinced his cousin to return to the scene. By the time police arrived, his cousin had taken off his sweater. Of couse, Complainant told police, "The driver was wearing a white sweater" so they grabbed Enrique who, while not driving, had indeed drunk four beers at home - so he was still in violation of his probation conditions. Not surprisingly he performed poorly on the sobriety test. After interviewing several attorneys, Enrique went with The Haggard Law Firm stating that he felt Mr. Haggard was the most aggressive, committed to success, and had the best success record of those he spoke with. We prepared our defenses, evidence and witnesses. In two slam-dunk hearings, we got Enrique's probation reinstated - despite his clear law violation and the judge's threat - and his DWI dismissed.
DWI 2nd
Case No. 1548825 - Ruben G.
DISMISSED
Ruben was stopped for speeding at 2:30 a.m. - prime time for DWI task force police - after downing six beers at a club with friends. Not surprisingly, he failed many of the sobriety tests at the scene. Our defense included exploitation of problems with the protocols the police used in gathering the evidence at the scene.
DWI - BT Failure
Case No. 1551096 - Matthew M.
DISMISSED
This young entrepreneur in a three-piece suit was stopped after leaving Pappasitos. He admitted to several Long Island teas and blew twice - failing both times. Police noted slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, poor balance, and the odor of alcohol. Several missed clues and improper turns rendered his sobriety test videos less than stellar. Nevertheless we prepared for Trial, subpoenaing the CMI Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test records log and all supporting data on the machine, it's maintenance, checks and operator. Among other things, these records helped us in our extrapolation defense. We won our Dismissal during Pre-Trial Motions.
"The minute he walked into the courtroom I could tell the District Attorneys, the Judge, and the other lawyers respected him. He was worth every penny." ~Matthew M.
DWI - .17 BT Failure
Case No. 1489950 - Ali R.
DISMISSED
Although we had our share of problems to overcome in this case, bigger problems with the State's case, which Mr. Haggard aggressively exploited, helped him to hammer home this pre-Trial Dismissal: On being stopped, Ali immediately ran afoul of the officer by failing to reveal he had a loaded gun and by stating he had had nothing to drink - although he blew a .17 on the Breath Test. We subpoenaed the chemical analysis records as well as extensive information from the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer 5000 and from DPS to help us contest the breat test readings. Due to a shift change, the officer that made the arrest was different from the officer that saw him behind the wheel. Finally, evidence of an old knee injury [Ali is an ex-Marine] helped combat some of the perceived clues to intoxication on the video.
DWI - BLEW .15
Case No. 1554246 - Troy H.
REDUCED TO CLASS C MISDEMEANOR PUBLIC INTOXICATION - 03.02.09
Although Troy was intoxicated, we fought hard to prove that the evidence was insufficient that he was ever seen driving by police, that he had been driving or that he intended to drive when found, by police, passed out behind the wheel in a public place with the motor running and when, upon being awakened, he attempted several times to put his truck in gear. This case was set for Jury Trial but Troy, who had a lengthy criminal history, elected to take Prosecutors' offer of a Class C PI on the date of trial.
DWI
Case No. 1513036 - Marco C.
DISMISSED
Marco was stopped by Pasadena police for going twice the speed limit. His passenger was arrested for Public Intoxication. Marco had had several beers but Mr. Haggard was able to refute the prosecutors' claims that his video indicated intoxication and, despite Marco's prior State Jail felony record, obtain a Dismissal.
DWI
Case No. 1409177 - Jeremy H.
JURY TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY
[Jeremy had a prior DWI reduced to a P.I.] After fishing all day with a friend they split a 60 ounce pitcher of beer. While driving home, Jeremy was stopped for being "all over the road" and hitting a curb. He refused the Breath Test but performed the Field Sobriety Tests twice. There were several errors on the scene and station videos, both conducted by sergeants, who had ordered him to remove his flip flops. Problems caused by being barefoot on a rocky road, and other performance problems were overcome by Mr. Haggard’s utilization of an expert witness who disputed the manner in which the sergeant administered the HGN eye exam and refuted the reliability of the field tests. [Note: Although Mr. Haggard knows police protocols in administering the FST, and understands why these tests are unreliable, a defense attorney cannot testify as an expert; thus an independent expert is needed to refute these tests at trial.] Mr. Haggard presented medical records showing Jeremy is legally blind in one eye and proved this did not affect his driving but could result in a false positive on the HGN eye exam. This case was tried twice; the first result was a 3 to 3 tie. Jeremy and Mr. Haggard refused to plead and retrenched for Trial No. 2. Victory was sweet.
"Mr. Haggard not only worked hard to insure my freedom on this DWI case; he helped me through it emotionally as well. He tried this case twice and both times totally blew me away with how he picked apart the testimony of the Prosecution’s and the State’s own witnesses, two police sergeants. I would recommend him to my closest friends. He went the extra mile for me and it definitely paid off." ~ Jeremy H.
"Mr. Haggard was very detailed with his examinations and did a great job with his research. We used an expert witness that was also helpful. The two policemen that testified against my son were both sergeants but Mr. Haggard did a great job cross-examining them. He made it clear to the Jury the areas where they weren’t being consistent. I was impressed by that." ~ Client's Mother
DWI
Case No. 1418712 - Zayde R.
DISMISSED DURING TRIAL
Zayde was stopped by Deer Park police after a concerned citizen reported he was weaving all over the road. The arresting officer further testified during trial the car had been weaving and crossed the center stripe. Zayde admitted to several beers at a club with friends, who served as drinking witnesses for the trial. He performed poorly on the State Field Sobriety Test; Mr. Haggard’s defense was in part Zayde’s large size and awkwardness (he plays college football), his customary manner of speech when sober, several documented ankle surgeries and an expert to testify on causes of our client’s poor performance other than intoxication. Several cruisers and officers and two police jurisdictions were involved in Zayde’s arrest. This led to confusion among the officers and resultant errors in the Offense Report all of which Mr. Haggard uncovered and exploited during trial. Mr. Haggard was brilliant in his strategy and cross-examination, successfully objecting to prosecutors’ veiled efforts to introduce hearsay evidence. With a Trial Notebook ready for any eventuality, he was preparing to file several Motions, including a Motion to Suppress after his cross-examination, when the prosecution admitted defeat and moved to dismiss the case.
“Mr. Haggard worked very hard for me and prepared me and my witnesses to testify. He also had an expert witness [on the Field Sobriety Test] who helped my case tremendously. Mr. Haggard was always one step ahead of the prosecution and got my case dismissed in the middle of the trial during his cross-examination. He made a very negative time in my life a lot easier. This outcome helped my personal life as well - this case happened at the same time I was preparing to apply to medical school. Due to this Dismissal of my DWI, Mr. Haggard will now be able to get a prior case sealed. He is also in the process of expunging this DWI. Now with the prior case sealed and the DWI Dismissal my record will be clean for my medical school application." ~ Zayde R.
“I just want to thank everyone in Mr. Haggard's firm that assisted in Zayde's case. I know it was a lot of work. It saved Zayde's future and I just appreciate it so much! My son is a pre-med, dean's list, university student. Having a DWI on his record would greatly reduce his chance of acceptance into medical school. I looked carefully through the letters that came in the mail from attorneys wanting to represent him. I chose Mr. Haggard because he was a former Chief Prosecutor, he had testimonial letters from former clients and he was a Christian. Mr. Haggard proved to be the best possible choice. He prepared my son's case leaving no stone unturned. Because of his experience, knowledge of the law and extensive preparation he was prepared at trial for any twist or prosecution mistake. I felt confident that Mr. Haggard was ready and able to handle the case at the highest level. I believe with all my heart that he cared about my son and the outcome of the case as if he were a relative. When the case was dismissed in a trial by jury, Mr. Haggard and his office staff were sincerely as happy as my son and I because of the impact on my son's future. I highly recommend Mr. Haggard for any case. He and his staff put their hearts in it and truly care. I believe you can't get better representation anywhere.” ~ Client's Mother
DWI
Case No. 1300825 - Barry C.
JURY TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY
Our client was stopped by the Bellaire Police for speeding at 2:00 a.m. He had been at a bar and admitted to drinking there and also at home prior to going to the bar. He refused the breath test but did submit twice to the field sobriety tests. Part of his problem in performing some of the tests had to do with his herniated disk. Mr. Haggard used medical testimony and records, among other tactics, to convince the jury our client was “Not Guilty” of this DWI charge.
DWI
Case No. [Expunged by Mr. Haggard] - Saleem R.
JURY TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY
“Mr. Haggard answered all my questions & addressed all of my concerns… & represented me in a professional manner. He understands the courts & works well within the system to provide excellent representation. He told me before he took the case how much it will cost & only charged me that amount. His office staff was very professional & treated me with respect. Mr. Haggard is honest and hard working. I highly recommend him.” ~ Saleem R.
DWI
Case No. [Expunged by Mr. Haggard.] - Uche M.
JURY TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY
Our client was arrested for attempting to go the wrong way on a one-way street in downtown Houston after leaving a party. Client had 2 civilian witnesses for sobriety vs. 2 police officers for intoxication. Due to Mr. Haggard’s presentation and cross-examination, the Jury believed the citizens over the police.
“Mr. Haggard worked very hard on my case. I was falsely accused and the Jury found me not guilty. Mr. Haggard will fight for your best interest; he knows the law.” ~ Uche M.
DWI, ENHANCED - PRIOR CONVICTION for DWI
Case No. [Expunged by Mr. Haggard.] - Henry K.
COURT TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY
Our client was found asleep - police claimed “passed out” - in a shopping center parking lot while waiting for his wife to arrive in her car. The Judge commented that Mr. Haggard‘s examination of the arresting officer was “torture”.
“Mr. Haggard was very professional in court. He made all the right calls and did a very good job. I didn’t even have to testify. I was very confident in him from start to finish.” ~ Henry K.
DWI
Case No. 1194892 - David F.
JURY TRIAL VERDICT: NOT GUILTY
Our client had a misdemeanor jail record and, on Mr. Haggard’s recommendation, did not testify. We had one sobriety witness whose testimony revealed, in the middle of trial, that our client had lied to the police officer regarding the amount he had had to drink. Nevertheless, Mr. Haggard was able to convince a well-chosen jury our client was not intoxicated.
“Mr. Haggard handled my case with sheer excellence. I don’t think anyone could have handled my case any better. The time and preparation he put into my case really showed me how much he cares for his clients. I would recommend him to anyone who is in need of a good lawyer.” ~ David F.
DWI
Case No. 1432595 - Chris G.
DISMISSED
Our client was an ex-con who was stopped in the early morning hours for driving with no headlamps. The officer stated he smelled alcohol on our client’s breath and our client admitted to having had alcohol earlier. He also had drinking witnesses who could vouch for him. He refused the breath test and field sobriety test. Lack of sufficient evidence of intoxication among other defenses helped Mr. Haggard obtain a Dismissal.
DWI
Case No. 1399782 - Holly M.
DISMISSED
Our client was pulled over by Humble P.D. at 2:30 a.m. after leaving the club where she worked as a dancer. She refused the breath test but did not perform well on the Field Sobriety Test due more to the shoes she was wearing than the several drinks she had consumed. We had several witnesses as to what, how much, and when she drank as well as how she appeared on leaving. Further, the club valet’s policy of not giving the keys to an intoxicated person was additional evidence in our favor.
FELONY DWI
Case No. 1056484 - Ronnely H.
DISMISSED
Our client had a lot at stake in this felony DWI – he was the holder of a CDL license when stopped for reckless driving and subsequently charged with Felony DWI. Had he been convicted, he would have lost his ability to make a living. He hired Mr. Haggard for his experience and proven track record.
FELONY DWI
Case No. 804865 - Joe S.
DISMISSED
“I was at a serious time in my life when all seemed hopeless. Mr. Haggard fought for what was right and never gave up! He had the utmost faith in the truth of my case and it was dismissed. It allows me to move forward in life.” ~ Joe S.
DWI 2nd
Case No. 1371903 - Michael S.
DISMISSED DURING TRIAL
Our client had been drinking with a real estate client but did not feel he was intoxicated. His prior DWI had ended in probation only 2 years ago and he was not willing to go through that again, so he hired Mr. Haggard to take the case all the way to Trial if necessary.
DWI 2nd WITH ACCIDENT
Case No. 1395944 - N. N.
FINE ONLY - NO JAIL TIME
Our client was a professional consulting engineer with such prestigious contracts as the U.S. Treasury on his resume. Yet he became quite intoxicated at a nightclub and caused a serious accident just blocks from it after driving away. Although jail time is customary with DWI 2nd cases, and even more so when the defendant causes a serious accident as a result of his intoxication, Mr. Haggard handled his case in such a way as to keep him entirely out of jail, for which our client, a family man, was very grateful.
DWI
Case No. 1366033 - Luis P.
DISMISSED
Stopped in the early morning hours for speeding, our client admitted to several drinks at dinner; later he also had more to drink at a bar. He had a drinking witness, which Mr. Haggard was able to use to our client’s advantage. On our client’s initial call to our office, he told us “probation is not an option here”.
“I was very nervous at first, but Mr. Haggard calmed me down and told me he would work as hard as he could to get this case dismissed. The prosecutors seemed to also respect Mr. Haggard’s ability and reputation and listened to his presentation. I praise Mr. Haggard and I would recommend him to anybody who needs a lawyer.” ~ Luis P.
DWI
Case No. 1330466 - Deborah B.
DISMISSED
Our client was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road after leaving a bar and police stated she “stank of alcohol”. She did poorly on the Field Sobriety Test but this was primarily due to nervousness which Mr. Haggard was able to prove sufficiently to obtain a Dismissal.
DWI
Case No. 1307232 - John M.
DISMISSED
Our client admitted to police he had been drinking. Although he was very tired, not having slept in 3 days, he was not intoxicated and felt that any errors on his field sobriety test were due to fatigue, which Mr. Haggard was able to prove. Our client was in school to become a commercial airline pilot so a conviction was out of the question. He hired Mr. Haggard to go all the way to trial if necessary but Mr. Haggard was able to obtain a Dismissal prior to the risk of Trial.
DWI
Case No. 1271853 - Michael M.
DISMISSED
Our client was a bartender at a prestigious downtown hotel and had left work, stone-cold sober, to drink somewhere else. He was stopped for speeding at 2:30 a.m. Mr. Haggard got the case dismissed using, among other things, errors with the Field Sobriety Test, documentation of our client’s work schedule, and our client’s good performance on the police station video. Our client’s foreign accent proved a stumbling point in the video but Mr. Haggard prevented his accent from contributing to the perception of intoxication.
DWI
Case No. 1141314 - Phillip P.
DISMISSED
Mr. Haggard used damning conversation between the cops in our client’s DWI video, among other tactics, to get this breath test failure DWI dismissed.
DWI
Case No. 1245778 - Joey B.
DISMISSED
Our client had been at a club & admitted to several beers; his friend was also arrested for public intoxication.
DWI
Case No. 9919869 - Patrick B.
DISMISSED
Mr. Haggard was able to get this case dismissed despite the fact that our client had an open container in his vehicle in addition to other alleged indications of intoxication.
DWI
Case No. 9904354 - James K.
DISMISSED
“When it looked real bad for me, I found Mr. Haggard & he was the difference between my going to jail or getting to go on with my life. He investigated my case and got the documents and witness statement we needed. If he had not done the great job he did for me to convince the D.A. and the judge to not revoke my probation and to dismiss the DWI, I would be in jail and would have lost my business. I highly recommend Mr. Haggard.” ~ James K.
Our victories are too numerous for a comprehensive list. Below are a few chosen
from prior years without case synopses or testimonials.
FELONY DWI
Case No. 867342 - Harris M.
DISMISSED DURING TRIAL
DWI
Case No. [Expunged by Mr. Haggard.] - Rudy H.
DISMISSED WHILE SET FOR TRIAL
DWI BREATH TEST FAILURE
Case No. 9732269 - Bryan D.
DISMISSED
DWI 2nd
Case No. 0980662 - Michael G.
DISMISSED
DWI
Case No. 1127304 - Joshua R.
DISMISSED
DWI
Case No. 1082472 - Kenneth G.
DISMISSED
DWI
Case No. 9935901 - Paul M.
DISMISSED
DWI
Case No. 0984078 - Michael G.
DISMISSED
DWI
Case No. 9747529 - Stanley D.
DISMISSED
*Evidence of prior performance should not be taken as a guarantee of future success. All cases are unique and must be handled on an individual basis. Tactics, strategies, and defenses will vary. This is not a comprehensive career-long (since 1973) listing within this category of charges but is intended as a recent and representative sample only.
Note: Clients have given their permission for any testimonials presented here.
|
PCS, Case No. 814167
DISMISSED ON BRIEF ON
SEARCH WITHOUT WARRANT
"My husband is a police officer and I was a licensed security officer and he’s the best attorney trying cases we’ve ever seen. He’s a great trial lawyer. We call Mr. Haggard "The Hammer". ~ Pamela B.
Case 857865 Aggrav Assault on Public Servant
Houston Attorney Carl Haggard
Featured in Texas Monthly
In a July 2008 ruling, the Court of Criminal Appeals held, regarding the use the Character Evidence: the Rules of Evidence generally forbid character evidence during the guilt phase of trial. Read more...
WARNING – A conviction in some offenses triggers an automatic suspension of your TDL. Call us to find out if yours is one. DWI’s: You have 15 days to save your TDL. Call us to learn your ALR options and what will guarantee a Dismissal to save your TDL.
Screen shot of Houston Criminal Defense Attorney Carl Haggard defending Houston surgeon charged with child molestation. [CDH - on right; July 2009]
Amount | Offense Level | Punishment Range
Amount | Offense Level | Punishment Range
Did you know....?
The Harris County Probation Department uses a qualitative EDT urine test which is capable of detecting any alcohol consumption within up to 80 hours. As it is qualitative, and not quantitative, trace amounts of alcohol will be detected.
Recent press conference of Houston criminal defense trial lawyer after his initial appearance in court for Houston orthopedic surgeon charged with pedophilia; Harris County Criminal Justice Center. [July, 2009]
Screen shot of Houston Criminal Defense Trial Attorney Carl Haggard in recent Harris County TV news case; defending Houston surgeon charged with child molestation.
|